Travel booking site
Speed optimization
Mobile 42 → 97
PageSpeed performance, desktop 46 → 96, in 2 days
Read case studyService · SEO, AEO & GEO
I make slow pages fast without redesigning them. I find what delays your main content, blocks taps and clicks, or makes the layout jump, then fix images, scripts, CSS, fonts, caching and server response. Every result is checked in PageSpeed Insights before and after.
Core Web Vitals are Google's three measurements of real page experience: Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) for how fast the main content appears, Interaction to Next Paint (INP) for how quickly the page responds to taps and clicks, and Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) for how much the layout jumps while loading. Speed is a ranking signal, but its bigger effect is on people: visitors who wait leave before they ever see your offer. Speed work is often the second step after a technical SEO audit.
Lab data from PageSpeed Insights and Lighthouse, plus field data from real Chrome users where your site has enough traffic.
Modern formats like WebP, correct sizes, lazy loading below the fold and a fast-loading main image.
Minify, defer or remove unused code and heavy third-party scripts.
Self-hosted, preloaded fonts with font-display: swap, so text never waits.
Page caching, browser caching, CDN and server response time.
Fixed dimensions for images, embeds and ads so nothing jumps.
| Metric | Good | Needs improvement | Poor |
|---|---|---|---|
| Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) | 2.5s or less | 2.5s - 4.0s | Over 4.0s |
| Interaction to Next Paint (INP) | 200ms or less | 200ms - 500ms | Over 500ms |
| Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) | 0.1 or less | 0.1 - 0.25 | Over 0.25 |
Google's published thresholds, measured at the 75th percentile of real visits.
Travel booking site
Mobile 42 → 97
PageSpeed performance, desktop 46 → 96, in 2 days
Read case studyReal estate (US)
Site Health 84% → 100%
in 16 days, then a monthly SEO and AI search plan
Read case studyPage experience is one of many ranking signals, and a perfect lab score isn't required. The bigger win is for visitors: faster pages keep people on the page long enough to call, book or buy.
No. The travel booking site went from 42 to 97 on mobile in 2 days without a redesign. The work is on images, code, fonts, caching and configuration.
PageSpeed Insights tests mobile on a slower simulated device and network, so heavy images and scripts hurt more. Most of your visitors are likely on phones, which is why mobile comes first.
Yes, as well as e-commerce stores and static HTML sites. On WordPress the usual causes are heavy themes, page builders, too many plugins and missing caching.
PageSpeed Insights lab tests vary slightly between runs. That's why I test the same pages before and after and compare all metrics, not just one score.
Send your website and goal. I reply within one business day (Dhaka time, GMT+6).